Guidelines for IRB Application

Please read this information carefully and refer to it as you are preparing your application. It will identify your responsibilities in the application process and provide information about the different categories of review, how the review is conducted, and the typical timeline of review.

If you are a student, there is additional information you need to provide as part of your application, and this is clearly identified below.

Step 1: Training Required for Research Involving Human Subjects

All investigators (faculty, staff, and students) conducting research that involves human subjects must complete the necessary training prior to submitting their IRB proposals. Ideally this should occur prior to preparing your application as it will provide useful information that can inform the design of your research study. CITI Program's Human Subjects Research (HSR) series covers the historical development of human subject protections, as well as current information on regulatory and ethical issues. It consists of a series of modules.

All IRB applications require proof of completion of CITI training by all investigators, e.g. faculty researchers, student researchers, and faculty mentoring both undergraduate and graduate student research projects (including all dissertation committee members).

Visit the CITI Program website and click on "Register" on the right of the homepage. If you encounter any difficulties in the registration process, refer to the "Getting Started Guide" section and follow step-by-step instructions on how to register for CITI training. Choose St. John Fisher University as your organization affiliation.

When you register, you will be asked to identify your learner group which determines the training modules you will have to complete. This is based on the nature of your research activity. The options are: 1) Biomedical Research Investigators, 2) Social & Behavioral Research Investigators, 3) Research with Data or Laboratory Specimens Only (i.e., no direct contact with human subjects), 4) IRB Members, or 5) Students in UG Research Classes. You must earn a cumulative score of 80% after completing all of the modules for your particular learner group. Please note, the online training can take up to several hours to complete. You are able to save your work, exit, and return to the training at a different time.

If you need more information about the different learner groups, please see the descriptions provided below:

Biomedical Research Investigator

Biomedical researchers study human physiology and the treatment or understanding of disease. Studies that are designed to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, or usefulness of an intervention including research on therapies, diagnostic procedures, and preventive measures are classified under biomedical research. Such studies can additionally include research on normal human functioning and development of the human body while exercising, fasting, feeding, sleeping, or learning, or responding to such things as stress or sensory stimulation. Further, studies may also compare the functioning of a particular physiological system at different stages of development. Also, studies can be directed at defining normal childhood development so that deviations from normal can be identified.

Social/ Behavioral/ Educational Research Investigator

Social/behavioral science is the study of human society and of individual relationships in, and to, society. This type of research is typically associated with the fields of education, psychology, sociology, anthropology, economics, political science, history, business, and more. Examples of studies would include (but are not limited to) research conducted in educational settings, psychological testing, research involving the use of educational tests, survey procedures, and/or interview procedures.

Research with Data or Laboratory Specimens Only

This learner group is specific to research involving the collection or study of existing data, documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens. The research has no direct contact with human subjects.

Students in Undergraduate Research Courses

The IRB strongly encourages instructors to require students who are conducting research involving human subjects as part of a course project to take this abbreviated 4-module training course. In such courses, class activities are designed so that students learn about the research process of a particular disciplinary field. See the "Course Projects Guidelines" document for more information about this category of research.

In addition to CITI training, you should also familiarize yourself with: 1) any published guidelines for the ethical treatment of subjects associated with your particular field of inquiry (e.g., as published by the American Psychological Association, American Sociological Association, etc.); 2) the policies and procedures of St. John Fisher University regarding human subjects; and, 3) any official policies in your department and/or school concerning research with human subjects.

Step 2: Preparing and Submitting Your Application for IRB Review

All Fisher investigators requesting IRB review of their project/research activity must submit a complete application form with all necessary supporting documents. The application form is available as a fillable Word template that you can complete and save as a Word document. Specific prompts are provided for you to record the essential information needed for the IRB review. Any student conducting research must collaborate with their research supervisor to complete the entire application.

The St. John Fisher University IRB conducts different levels of review depending on the type of research being proposed. Revised federal guidelines have established new exempt categories of research studies based on their risk profile. See descriptions of each level of review below.

Your application is considered complete when you include all required supporting documents in a single pdf. Please use the IRB Checklist [pdf] to ensure your IRB Application is complete. Common examples of required supporting documents include:

  • Consent form(s) (review the Consent Form Guidelines [pdf] first and then create any required consent forms using the appropriate templates available on the Documents and Forms page)
  • Copies of data collection tools (surveys, questionnaires, etc.)
  • Letter of introduction to the participants (you need to include your status as a Fisher student/faculty and that the St. John Fisher University IRB has reviewed the project/research)
  • Letter of institutional support (if another agency, institution, etc. is involved in your study)
  • Proof of successful completion of CITI training by all investigators
  • Research Supervisor Form (required of all students)
  • Current CV (required of all doctoral students only)

The complete application (in a single pdf) should be submitted from your SJF email address to irb@sjf.edu. The body of the email must include your full name (students should also include the name of their research supervisor), the title of your application, and a numbered list of all supporting documents. 

Additional Information About Categories of IRB Review

Exempt Review

Recent changes to the federal guidelines have increased the categories of research that now fit under exempt review. A full description of these categories can be found in the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (Part 46 Protection of Human Subjects, Subpart A, 46.104): The categories most commonly reviewed are outlined below:

Exemption Category Examples
Educational Practices:
Research conducted in established or commonly accepted educational settings, involving normal educational practices, such as:
  1. research on regular and special education instructional strategies; or
  2. research on the effectiveness of or the comparison among instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management methods.
(45 CFR 46 104 (d)(1))
  • A study involving professional development for faculty.
  • A study comparing two different sets of curricula being implemented.
This category does not apply to surveys, interviews, questionnaires, or focus groups, which are covered under exempt category two. Additionally, the study cannot harm the students’ opportunity to learn.
Educational Tests, Interviews, Surveys, Observation of Public Behavior:
Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures or observation of public behavior, if at least one of the following is met:
  1. information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects;
  2. any disclosure of the human subjects' responses outside the research would not reasonably place the subjects at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects' financial standing, employability, or reputation; or
  3. information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects and if the IRB conducts a limited review for provisions for protecting privacy and maintaining confidentiality
(45 CFR 46 104 (d)(2))
  • A focus group involving college students (over the age of 18) and their experiences as student athletes.
  • An anonymous survey studying various types of video game usage.
  • A study observing patterns of cyclists behavior at stop lights.
This category does not apply to interviews or surveys with minors and only applies to observing behavior of children if the study team does not participate in the activities being observed.  Observations must be in a public setting
Benign Behavior Interventions with Adults:
Research involving benign behavioral interventions in conjunction with the collection of information through verbal or written responses or audiovisual recordings if at least one of the following criteria is met:
  1. information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects;
  2. any disclosure of the human subjects' responses outside the research would not reasonably place the subjects at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects' financial standing, employability, or reputation; or
  3. information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects and if the IRB conducts a limited review for provisions for protecting privacy and maintaining confidentiality.
(45 CFR 46 104 (d)(3))
  • A study involving noise and its effect on participants to perform memory tasks.
  • A study where participants have to make allocations of finances between themselves and others under varying circumstances.
This category does not include minors. Benign interventions must not have a lasting adverse impact on participants and should be brief, harmless, painless, non-offensive, and non-embarrassing. They should not be physically invasive. Research involving deception is only allowed if the participant is notified and agrees to that possibility ahead of time.
Secondary Uses of Identifiable Private Information or Identifiable Biospecimens:
Secondary research for which consent is not required if at least one of the following criteria is met:
  1. The sources are publicly available; or
  2. the information is recorded by the investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects and the investigator does not contact or re-identify the subjects; or
  3. the research is collected by or on behalf of the federal government using government generated or collected information obtained for non-research activities.
(45 CFR 46 104 (d)(4))
  • A study using existing deidentified data from a private entity such as a health insurance database.
  • Analyzing publicly accessible, de-identified databases such as the Census Bureau.
This category does cover data analysis from online repositories where users have to pay a fee or must register to access the data.
Public Service Projects:
Research and demonstration projects which are conducted by or subject to the approval of department or agency heads, and which are designed to study, evaluate, or otherwise examine the following:
  1. public benefit or service programs; or
  2. procedures for obtaining benefits or services under those programs;
  3. possible changes in or alternatives to those programs or procedures; or
  4. possible changes in methods or levels of payment for benefits or services under those programs.
(45 CFR 46 104 (d)(5))
This category is limited to programs that are assigned by a federal department head.  This category will rarely, if ever, apply to research at Fisher.
Taste and Food Quality Evaluation and Consumer Acceptance Studies:
Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer acceptance studies, if:
  1. wholesome foods without additives are consumed; or
  2. a food is consumed that contains a food ingredient at or below the level and for a use found to be safe, or agricultural chemical or environmental contaminant at or below the level found to be safe, by the Food and Drug Administration or approved by the Environmental Protection Agency or the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
  • A study that evaluates the preference of wholesome foods.
  • A study that looks at approved levels of an agricultural chemical on how fruit tastes.
Fisher IRB anticipates that this category will be rarely used.

Proposals will be reviewed by the IRB chair's designee, a member of the IRB committee. The designee may request revisions to the application and the applicant will need to resubmit a revised application. Once the designee is satisfied with the proposal, it will be recorded as approved and the researcher will then receive formal, written notification.

Timeline: Please allow at least two weeks for an initial response. If revisions are required, please allow an additional two weeks for a response once revisions have been submitted. Time will vary depending on the extent of required revisions. Research categorized as exempt review that is being conducted as part of a class activity can follow the modified application process for Course Projects. See information about Course Project Review below.

Expedited Review

If the proposed research study does not fit in any of the eight categories for exempt review, and involves minimal risk to human subjects, then it will require an expedited review. The proposal will be reviewed by two members of the IRB committee. The committee members may request revisions to the proposal. If this is the case, the IRB chair will provide the applicant with a memo detailing all requested revisions. The applicant will need to resubmit a revised application. Once the reviewers have approved the proposal, the researcher will receive formal, written notification.

Timeline: Please allow at least two weeks for an initial response. If revisions are required, please allow an additional two weeks for a response once revisions have been submitted. Time will vary depending on the extent of required revisions.

Full Review

If the proposed research study involves the following, it will require a full review:

  • Vulnerable populations, particularly prisoners and individuals with limited decision making capabilities
  • Sensitive topics, including illegal behaviors
  • A complex research design requiring the expertise of multiple IRB members to evaluate
  • Deception
  • More than a minimal risk (as determined by an IRB reviewer)

This will be scheduled to take place at the following IRB meeting. Application materials will be forwarded to all IRB members. The IRB members may request revisions to the application. If this is the case, the IRB chair will provide the applicant with a memo detailing all requested revisions. The applicant will need to resubmit a revised application. When the IRB has approved the proposal, the researcher will receive formal, written notification.

Timeline: Please allow at least four weeks for an initial response. If revisions are required, please allow an additional two weeks for a response once revisions have been submitted. Time will vary depending on the extent of required revisions.

Course Project Review

Many courses require students to engage in research activities. Research conducted solely for pedagogical purposes may not need IRB review. To determine if a course project needs IRB review, please refer to the IRB Guidelines for Course Projects [pdf]. In the case where a course project involving human subjects does not need IRB review, the IRB strongly encourages that instructors require their undergraduate students to complete the abbreviated CITI training as a course assignment. It is important to note that students participating in a project that does not require IRB review will not be able to make data or results of this project publicly available beyond St. John Fisher University.

Project Modification or Continuation Review

All research is initially approved for one year. Any change to an approved research protocol requires the submission of the Project Continuation or Modification Form [dotx]. A modification is defined as any change to a protocol from what was previously approved (e.g., changes in research procedures, the informed consent process, the consent/assent document, etc.). Substantive changes may require submission of an entirely new IRB application at the discretion of the IRB. A modification approval within the original timeline of the project does not change the approval termination date.

Any approved research that goes beyond one year also requires the submission of the Project Continuation or Modification Form [dotx]. Renewed research applications are approved for one year.